February 21, 2001
Contact: Elizabeth Conlisk (614) 292-3040


   COLUMBUS -- The Ohio State University is making a major move to support implementation of its Academic Plan by aligning internal resources more closely with identified academic goals.

Base budget allocations in Ohio State’s 18 degree-granting colleges are being aligned with goals of the Academic Plan, the university’s strategy to become one of the world’s truly great universities. Plans call for allocating and redirecting $9.5 million to $13 million among the colleges over the next five years – including those housing departments and programs that are expected to lead the effort to advance academic excellence.

Budget rebasing, as the process is termed, is one component of an overall university plan to change the budgeting process, which has been on the administration’s agenda for several years. The overall budget restructuring process will encourage colleges and departments to provide new programs, create new courses, reduce course access problems, collaborate with industry partners, expand federally funded research and undertake other initiatives. Revenue generated by such activities as offering more sections of high-demand courses to students closed out of courses and creating new majors that meet student career plans will be used to provide direct financial support for the programs that create them.

The budget restructuring process is considered a critical step in positioning the university as a premier teaching and research institution, said Edward J. Ray, executive vice president and provost. “Through the Academic Plan, The Ohio State University has initiated an ambitious effort to articulate how it can substantially enhance the excellence of its academic programs and meet its commitment as a land-grant university to contribute to the economic and social well-being of the people of Ohio,” Ray said. “Realigning our college base budgets in this way not only helps the colleges contribute most effectively to the University’s goals, but represents the most productive and responsible use of the funding support we receive from the public.”

In some cases under the rebasing, funds that colleges receive from the university through revenue transfers from other units will be decreased. In others, some colleges that contribute to other units will be able to retain more funds within their budgets. A number of college base budget allocations will remain unchanged. These allocations will be based on a number of factors, including the expected role of the college in the Academic Plan, its ability to generate revenues and the cost structure of its academic programs.

“It is not my goal to make every college a ‘tub on its own bottom’ by driving every college to a break-even position under some formulaic procedure,” Ray said. “Instead, the goal is to give every college a clear understanding of what we expect from them academically, what resources they can expect to generate themselves and what resources they can expect from the university.”

The rebasing, which would begin July 1, is designed as a multiyear process to avoid excessive disruption to academic programs and to allow for annual review and modifications, if needed, of budget decisions. All deans face a March deadline to produce plans that align their base budget resource use with goals of the Academic Plan. The process will be reviewed in five years.

Ohio State President William E. Kirwan said that, with a change of this magnitude, it has been critical to consult broadly and build checks and balances into the process as the budget restructuring is implemented, and such consultation will continue to be a part of the process. “This university has very publicly committed to joining the top ranks of the nation’s public research and teaching institutions. To do that, bold steps of this nature are essential.”

He added that budget restructuring and rebasing have been done entirely within the context of the Academic Plan. “Fund transfers among the colleges and future investments in them will only occur based on proposals by the colleges as to how the additional funds could advance the Academic Plan,” Kirwan said.

College clusters

Under the rebasing, Ray has clustered colleges into three groups:

Continuing commitment to Selective Investment programs, and rewarding them for their excellence, is a major element of the rebasing, Ray said. “The colleges housing these 13 quality programs will benefit the most from the budget realignment. If the university is to be successful in achieving its goals regarding faculty, academic programs, quality of teaching and learning, and creation of a diverse community, these academic units, and ultimately many others, need to be successful,” he said.

The six Selective Investment colleges account for 60 percent of tenure-track faculty, 70 percent of sponsored research and 50 percent of all degrees awarded. The five other traditional core colleges provide 35 percent of all degrees granted and are home to a number of high-quality and internationally visible programs. They also play a key role in interdisciplinary initiatives and contribute significantly to outreach and engagement.

The professional colleges provide high-quality teaching, research and service, and many are highly ranked within their fields. Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy posed a rebasing challenge, Ray said, because they all are effective and important to the university and to the people of Ohio, but receive substantial transfers despite having less relative immediate impact on effective implementation of the Academic Plan.

Consultative process

This launch of budget restructuring results from a series of extensive consultations across the university dating as far back as 1995. Faculty, staff, students and administrators have been involved on a number of committees that examined and reported on the advantages and ramifications of changing the budgeting process. The university also has taken other institutions’ experiences into account. “Incentive-based budget systems have been adopted at many of the best public and private universities,” said William J. Shkurti, senior vice president for business and finance. “We have tried to learn from both the successes and failures at these other institutions in order to develop a model that best meets Ohio State’s unique circumstances.”

Paul Beck, chair of the Department of Political Science, chaired an ad hoc committee on revenue generation during the consultative process. “This budget restructuring represents a different philosophy at the university, and pays much more attention to providing incentives to colleges to bring their costs into line with their enrollments and other sources of revenue,” he said.

“This new budgeting system will make us more responsive to students as a key source of our revenues and a central part of our mission. We’re going to have to pay more attention to what student demand is for courses, and I think that’s warranted,” Beck said. “There is a balancing act that has to take place between the costs and revenues of a college and its contributions to realization of the Academic Plan. It took a long time to get here because we had to have the necessary information in hand and to work out some very difficult implementation issues. It also was necessary to have the Academic Plan in place as a statement of our priorities and our mission.”

Fisher College of Business Dean Joseph Alutto said he supports the rebasing plan. “My own sense is that the logic is very clear. That judgments have to be involved in aligning base budgets with the university’s goals is very important, and getting to that point has been a very complex process,” he said. “Though it looks in the short run like we may be hurt by the rebasing, we are comfortable with the process and are on board. This is a unique approach for any university to take and it’s one that can work at Ohio State.”

Moving forward

Ray said other revenue resources targeted to support the Academic Plan will include base-line growth in the state share of instructional support; tobacco funds primarily supporting biomedical research; “outside-the-box” funds that can be generated through more effective financial management of existing resources and are intended primarily for seed growth in research support; tuition cap relief which, if granted, would be targeted to improving undergraduate education; private gifts; distance education revenue; enterprise development; and targeted state funds such as those from capital budgets and new programs like the Ohio Plan.

“As we move forward, units will have to pay more attention to how their revenues and costs balance out, and with the incentive-based budgeting, there is potential for units to be more aggressive in generating revenues. And that’s a good thing, especially in an environment in which increases in state support will not be sufficient to move the university forward,” Beck said.

“But there will always have to be central protection of some of those costly activities that don’t necessarily generate high revenues, and that’s appropriate and very important.”

The complete document outlining the base budget changes, “Budget Restructuring, Base Budgets and the Academic Plan,” is available in the Office of Academic Affairs, college offices and on the Web at http://www.oaa.admin.ohio-state.edu/ and http://www.rpia.ohio-state.edu/

###

(LO)