WEBVTT

1
00:00:01.020 --> 00:00:03.570
<v ->Take a moment and just imagine with me.</v>

2
00:00:03.570 --> 00:00:06.557
Imagine a world that runs on civil discourse.

3
00:00:06.557 --> 00:00:09.270
A place where uncomfortable conversations

4
00:00:09.270 --> 00:00:10.860
or maybe even heated arguments

5
00:00:10.860 --> 00:00:13.203
around the Thanksgiving table don't exist.

6
00:00:14.040 --> 00:00:17.133
Where political conversations don't turn ugly immediately.

7
00:00:18.060 --> 00:00:20.490
A world where calm and insightful discussion

8
00:00:20.490 --> 00:00:22.170
is the productive norm.

9
00:00:22.170 --> 00:00:24.390
Maybe even fights in the hockey rink are solved

10
00:00:24.390 --> 00:00:26.460
with a handshake instead of fists.

11
00:00:26.460 --> 00:00:29.820
Well, maybe not that last one, but you get the idea.

12
00:00:29.820 --> 00:00:33.390
Anyway, sounds like a beautiful world, but a fantasy.

13
00:00:33.390 --> 00:00:35.550
Never going to happen, right?

14
00:00:35.550 --> 00:00:38.160
Well, if you were to ask our two guests today,

15
00:00:38.160 --> 00:00:39.780
they'd tell you that this is a world

16
00:00:39.780 --> 00:00:41.850
we could be living in right now.

17
00:00:41.850 --> 00:00:44.943
All it takes is a little listening and a little practice.

18
00:00:48.471 --> 00:00:51.054
(upbeat music)

19
00:00:56.730 --> 00:00:57.930
I'm Jacob Carozza

20
00:00:57.930 --> 00:01:00.120
and you're listening to "Now at Ohio State".

21
00:01:00.120 --> 00:01:02.220
We talk with researchers, innovators,

22
00:01:02.220 --> 00:01:04.650
and bold thinkers who look at our world,

23
00:01:04.650 --> 00:01:06.330
see what the real challenges are,

24
00:01:06.330 --> 00:01:08.673
and create the solutions that people need now.

25
00:01:12.150 --> 00:01:14.490
Michael Neblo is a professor of political science,

26
00:01:14.490 --> 00:01:18.150
philosophy, communication, and public policy at Ohio State.

27
00:01:18.150 --> 00:01:20.550
His research focuses on deliberative democracy

28
00:01:20.550 --> 00:01:22.380
and political psychology.

29
00:01:22.380 --> 00:01:23.820
He's also a published author

30
00:01:23.820 --> 00:01:25.830
and the director of Ohio State's Institute

31
00:01:25.830 --> 00:01:28.560
for Democratic Engagement and Accountability.

32
00:01:28.560 --> 00:01:30.120
He sits down with our Chris Bournea

33
00:01:30.120 --> 00:01:32.310
to discuss the power of civil discourse,

34
00:01:32.310 --> 00:01:34.410
how we can work past our partisanship,

35
00:01:34.410 --> 00:01:37.680
and what role universities and students play in the efforts

36
00:01:37.680 --> 00:01:39.453
to understand one another better.

37
00:01:40.620 --> 00:01:42.360
<v ->Well, Michael, thank you again for agreeing</v>

38
00:01:42.360 --> 00:01:43.980
to talk about this topic.

39
00:01:43.980 --> 00:01:44.940
I really appreciate it.

40
00:01:44.940 --> 00:01:47.010
<v ->Oh, thank you so much for having me.</v>

41
00:01:47.010 --> 00:01:49.140
I'm really excited and grateful to be here.

42
00:01:49.140 --> 00:01:51.660
<v ->So I guess starting off, why is it even important</v>

43
00:01:51.660 --> 00:01:55.024
for citizens to engage in civil discourse

44
00:01:55.024 --> 00:01:56.910
in a democratic society?

45
00:01:56.910 --> 00:01:58.110
Why is that important at all?

46
00:01:58.110 --> 00:02:00.330
<v ->It's a good question 'cause a lot of people think</v>

47
00:02:00.330 --> 00:02:04.590
that politics is really about power and money and votes.

48
00:02:04.590 --> 00:02:07.500
And so it's reasonable to ask why we should spend a lot

49
00:02:07.500 --> 00:02:10.590
of time and energy and emotional investment

50
00:02:10.590 --> 00:02:12.330
in trying to maintain civil discourse.

51
00:02:12.330 --> 00:02:14.010
And I think there are two reasons.

52
00:02:14.010 --> 00:02:17.700
I think one, it's a good way to show respect

53
00:02:17.700 --> 00:02:19.620
to each other as democratic equals,

54
00:02:19.620 --> 00:02:22.620
as democratic citizens, people who have to live together

55
00:02:22.620 --> 00:02:24.900
and have a certain degree of shared fate.

56
00:02:24.900 --> 00:02:27.540
And then the other reason is that we make better decisions.

57
00:02:27.540 --> 00:02:30.570
If we can have a civil discussion without its spinning off

58
00:02:30.570 --> 00:02:34.590
into name calling and fruitless yelling at each other,

59
00:02:34.590 --> 00:02:37.500
we can share reasons, we can share perspectives,

60
00:02:37.500 --> 00:02:40.440
we can try to understand where there's room for compromise

61
00:02:40.440 --> 00:02:44.580
or even win-wins that are available to us sometimes.

62
00:02:44.580 --> 00:02:46.470
And civil dialogue,

63
00:02:46.470 --> 00:02:49.950
civil discourse can help reveal those opportunities

64
00:02:49.950 --> 00:02:52.800
and can help us make better decisions.

65
00:02:52.800 --> 00:02:54.420
<v ->So how's it even possible</v>

66
00:02:54.420 --> 00:02:57.270
to have civil dialogue in this era

67
00:02:57.270 --> 00:03:01.110
when there's such extreme political polarization,

68
00:03:01.110 --> 00:03:04.590
and we may not even agree on the same set of facts?

69
00:03:04.590 --> 00:03:07.200
<v ->Well, unfortunately it's a lot harder. (laughing)</v>

70
00:03:07.200 --> 00:03:10.380
But that doesn't mean I think we should just punt

71
00:03:10.380 --> 00:03:12.390
as soon as it gets hard.

72
00:03:12.390 --> 00:03:15.780
And to take an example, I'm a political scientist, right?

73
00:03:15.780 --> 00:03:17.820
I engage with people all the time

74
00:03:17.820 --> 00:03:19.770
when we don't agree on the facts.

75
00:03:19.770 --> 00:03:22.140
If anything, we wouldn't have anything to talk about

76
00:03:22.140 --> 00:03:23.610
if we already agreed on the facts.

77
00:03:23.610 --> 00:03:26.910
What we're arguing over is the theory and the facts, right?

78
00:03:26.910 --> 00:03:31.380
And that's precisely why I think it's incumbent upon us

79
00:03:31.380 --> 00:03:32.220
to do two things.

80
00:03:32.220 --> 00:03:36.300
One, to only go to the mattresses, so to speak,

81
00:03:36.300 --> 00:03:38.670
when we really need to.

82
00:03:38.670 --> 00:03:41.370
It can't be a cynical tactic that we just go to

83
00:03:41.370 --> 00:03:43.050
because we think we can get a little advantage

84
00:03:43.050 --> 00:03:44.220
going that way.

85
00:03:44.220 --> 00:03:45.660
If we do that all the time,

86
00:03:45.660 --> 00:03:49.440
it corrodes that background of respect and trust

87
00:03:49.440 --> 00:03:52.320
that facilitates us being able to show each other respect

88
00:03:52.320 --> 00:03:54.630
and make those good decisions.

89
00:03:54.630 --> 00:03:56.820
So that's why I think it's really important

90
00:03:56.820 --> 00:03:58.500
that people don't pull the trigger

91
00:03:58.500 --> 00:04:01.320
and pull away from civil discourse

92
00:04:01.320 --> 00:04:06.320
or engage in disruptive or less respectful forms of politics

93
00:04:06.600 --> 00:04:08.460
unless they really have good reason to do so.

94
00:04:08.460 --> 00:04:09.930
If they do have good reason to do so.

95
00:04:09.930 --> 00:04:14.040
I repeat, not only is it okay, we have to sometimes.

96
00:04:14.040 --> 00:04:17.520
But that we should err on the side

97
00:04:17.520 --> 00:04:19.350
of believing in the good faith

98
00:04:19.350 --> 00:04:21.480
of the person across the table from us

99
00:04:21.480 --> 00:04:23.700
and trying to meet them where they are, understand them,

100
00:04:23.700 --> 00:04:25.383
and engage them where they are.

101
00:04:26.339 --> 00:04:29.100
And I would say the same thing is true of polarization,

102
00:04:29.100 --> 00:04:34.100
that in itself, disagreeing strongly about what to do

103
00:04:34.110 --> 00:04:37.038
doesn't mean that we can't see the other side,

104
00:04:37.038 --> 00:04:40.770
respect it, disagree, offer the arguments

105
00:04:40.770 --> 00:04:44.910
why we think our position is better, but to do so in a way

106
00:04:44.910 --> 00:04:47.070
that leaves open the possibility

107
00:04:47.070 --> 00:04:50.430
that they might have something to what they're saying.

108
00:04:50.430 --> 00:04:52.260
And even if we ultimately think

109
00:04:52.260 --> 00:04:54.300
there's nothing to what they're saying,

110
00:04:54.300 --> 00:04:56.610
they're still human beings and our fellow citizens

111
00:04:56.610 --> 00:04:59.250
and worthy of that respect and engagement.

112
00:04:59.250 --> 00:05:02.604
<v ->At schools and universities, how do educators and students</v>

113
00:05:02.604 --> 00:05:04.650
talk about issues like politics

114
00:05:04.650 --> 00:05:06.180
and social issues in a way

115
00:05:06.180 --> 00:05:09.120
in which everyone feels respected and heard?

116
00:05:09.120 --> 00:05:11.460
<v ->So in a lot of ways, I think universities</v>

117
00:05:11.460 --> 00:05:15.660
are set up to foster, encourage,

118
00:05:15.660 --> 00:05:19.530
and value those sorts of disagreements

119
00:05:19.530 --> 00:05:21.390
and that form of dialogue.

120
00:05:21.390 --> 00:05:26.310
That said, it's clearly become more difficult over time.

121
00:05:26.310 --> 00:05:30.150
And in some ways, I think that has more to do

122
00:05:30.150 --> 00:05:35.150
with a decline in trust than in civility per se.

123
00:05:35.250 --> 00:05:39.750
Because you've got a lot of people who are self-disciplined

124
00:05:39.750 --> 00:05:42.750
and they're not engaging in uncivil forms

125
00:05:42.750 --> 00:05:45.810
of behavior at the drop of a hat themselves.

126
00:05:45.810 --> 00:05:48.180
But they don't trust that the other person is not.

127
00:05:48.180 --> 00:05:50.040
And that just leads to disengagement

128
00:05:50.040 --> 00:05:51.569
or to people sitting on their hands

129
00:05:51.569 --> 00:05:54.960
or to kind of closing off ahead of time

130
00:05:54.960 --> 00:05:56.700
rather than really listening

131
00:05:56.700 --> 00:05:58.770
and trying to meet people where they're at

132
00:05:58.770 --> 00:06:01.200
and take them seriously from their point of view,

133
00:06:01.200 --> 00:06:03.390
even if we ultimately continue to disagree

134
00:06:03.390 --> 00:06:05.280
at a very deep level.

135
00:06:05.280 --> 00:06:10.280
And so as an instructor, I think my goal has always been,

136
00:06:11.310 --> 00:06:14.430
but it's even deeper and more urgent now,

137
00:06:14.430 --> 00:06:19.430
to try to facilitate a local class culture where people see

138
00:06:20.610 --> 00:06:22.350
that it's okay to disagree

139
00:06:22.350 --> 00:06:26.250
and that it can be done respectfully and constructively.

140
00:06:26.250 --> 00:06:29.310
It doesn't mean that the other person is bad,

141
00:06:29.310 --> 00:06:31.920
that we don't jump to the conclusion

142
00:06:31.920 --> 00:06:33.960
that if we disagree, somebody has to be stupid

143
00:06:33.960 --> 00:06:35.580
or morally vicious.

144
00:06:35.580 --> 00:06:37.980
It might be that we have different life experiences,

145
00:06:37.980 --> 00:06:40.080
that we have different perspectives,

146
00:06:40.080 --> 00:06:44.340
different theoretical backgrounds that we bring to the task.

147
00:06:44.340 --> 00:06:48.210
And so modeling that out of the gate for the students,

148
00:06:48.210 --> 00:06:50.820
showing a certain degree of vulnerability,

149
00:06:50.820 --> 00:06:55.680
not coming in hard every time I feel provoked,

150
00:06:55.680 --> 00:06:58.050
I think is really essential.

151
00:06:58.050 --> 00:06:58.883
But it can be done.

152
00:06:58.883 --> 00:06:59.716
I'm teaching right now,

153
00:06:59.716 --> 00:07:02.310
and it's actually a course on, in a sense, civil discourse,

154
00:07:02.310 --> 00:07:04.140
it's called Debating Democracy.

155
00:07:04.140 --> 00:07:05.310
And we've had guest speakers

156
00:07:05.310 --> 00:07:08.760
from former members of Congress and lobbyists

157
00:07:08.760 --> 00:07:12.150
and people from opposite sides of the political spectrum.

158
00:07:12.150 --> 00:07:15.870
But the great part of it is that our guests model,

159
00:07:15.870 --> 00:07:18.720
these are people who, for a living,

160
00:07:18.720 --> 00:07:23.100
are in conflict with each other about politics.

161
00:07:23.100 --> 00:07:25.800
And yet they treat each other with dignity and respect

162
00:07:25.800 --> 00:07:28.710
and understand where the other person is coming from.

163
00:07:28.710 --> 00:07:33.210
And so I think it starts really, to the extent

164
00:07:33.210 --> 00:07:35.760
that faculty have, you know, influence on this,

165
00:07:35.760 --> 00:07:38.130
it starts with modeling it in the classroom

166
00:07:38.130 --> 00:07:41.613
and rewarding that behavior when the students exhibit it.

167
00:07:42.540 --> 00:07:44.160
<v ->Outside of the classroom,</v>

168
00:07:44.160 --> 00:07:46.950
how can we have conversations with people who

169
00:07:46.950 --> 00:07:48.870
we may not see eye to eye,

170
00:07:48.870 --> 00:07:50.580
we may not see the world in the same way?

171
00:07:50.580 --> 00:07:54.750
<v ->Yeah, I think one of the key ways to do that,</v>

172
00:07:54.750 --> 00:07:58.770
and this is backed by research, is to ask questions.

173
00:07:58.770 --> 00:08:03.770
And ask questions in a way that doesn't implicitly

174
00:08:04.230 --> 00:08:06.450
say that you're agreeing with the person,

175
00:08:06.450 --> 00:08:10.053
but doesn't start from the premise that they must be crazy.

176
00:08:11.280 --> 00:08:13.260
And really trying to understand.

177
00:08:13.260 --> 00:08:16.740
And you can think that what they're saying

178
00:08:16.740 --> 00:08:20.880
is immovably crazy, but that doesn't mean they are crazy.

179
00:08:20.880 --> 00:08:23.220
Because all of us, at one point or another,

180
00:08:23.220 --> 00:08:25.290
probably believe or espouse

181
00:08:25.290 --> 00:08:27.150
something that's pretty indefensible.

182
00:08:27.150 --> 00:08:30.900
And the key is to understand what got them there,

183
00:08:30.900 --> 00:08:33.600
and if it's available,

184
00:08:33.600 --> 00:08:38.600
helping to gently at least help them see the alternative,

185
00:08:38.700 --> 00:08:39.933
why you don't agree.

186
00:08:40.890 --> 00:08:43.920
And sometimes it goes back to actually just a version

187
00:08:43.920 --> 00:08:46.470
of what we were talking about in the last question,

188
00:08:46.470 --> 00:08:48.900
which is just modeling for people,

189
00:08:48.900 --> 00:08:52.620
having them experience in a very human, direct,

190
00:08:52.620 --> 00:08:54.344
one-to-one way

191
00:08:54.344 --> 00:08:57.090
that disagreement doesn't have to mean,

192
00:08:57.090 --> 00:08:59.400
doesn't have to jump to some sort

193
00:08:59.400 --> 00:09:02.343
of judgment about another person's sanity or humanity.

194
00:09:03.210 --> 00:09:05.070
<v ->So can you tell me about the work you do</v>

195
00:09:05.070 --> 00:09:07.410
with the Institute for Democratic Engagement

196
00:09:07.410 --> 00:09:10.846
and Accountability, whose acronym is appropriately IDEA?

197
00:09:10.846 --> 00:09:11.679
<v ->(chuckling) Thank you.</v>

198
00:09:11.679 --> 00:09:16.080
Yes, I kind of like the idea that it's the Ohio State IDEA.

199
00:09:16.080 --> 00:09:19.230
I really think we should be asking people more

200
00:09:19.230 --> 00:09:21.480
what they think they're good consistent,

201
00:09:21.480 --> 00:09:23.640
and encouraging them to re-engage

202
00:09:23.640 --> 00:09:26.460
and facilitating them being able to do so

203
00:09:26.460 --> 00:09:28.470
in a constructive way.

204
00:09:28.470 --> 00:09:30.930
At our institute, what we really focus on,

205
00:09:30.930 --> 00:09:33.330
we mobilize expertise and the resources

206
00:09:33.330 --> 00:09:35.070
of the university as well.

207
00:09:35.070 --> 00:09:36.270
But it's not to make

208
00:09:36.270 --> 00:09:39.240
or recommend substantive policy in itself.

209
00:09:39.240 --> 00:09:41.970
It's to create the conditions where people

210
00:09:41.970 --> 00:09:43.650
who have stepped away from politics

211
00:09:43.650 --> 00:09:45.630
because they think nobody's listening

212
00:09:45.630 --> 00:09:47.010
and that it's just a blood sport.

213
00:09:47.010 --> 00:09:49.350
It's an ugly thing they want nothing to do with,

214
00:09:49.350 --> 00:09:51.480
who have stepped away from politics.

215
00:09:51.480 --> 00:09:54.000
And just to go back to your previous question briefly,

216
00:09:54.000 --> 00:09:55.680
that magnifies the perception

217
00:09:55.680 --> 00:09:57.810
that it's only people shouting at each other.

218
00:09:57.810 --> 00:09:59.670
'Cause a lot of other people have opted out

219
00:09:59.670 --> 00:10:02.010
saying, I want no part of this, right?

220
00:10:02.010 --> 00:10:04.110
But in the Institute's work, one of the things

221
00:10:04.110 --> 00:10:05.730
we really try to do is say, no,

222
00:10:05.730 --> 00:10:08.070
there are opportunities for this,

223
00:10:08.070 --> 00:10:11.190
to do a better form of politics, come on back in.

224
00:10:11.190 --> 00:10:13.440
And people do, and they do in droves.

225
00:10:13.440 --> 00:10:16.020
And then what we do is subsidize their ability

226
00:10:16.020 --> 00:10:17.880
to participate meaningfully.

227
00:10:17.880 --> 00:10:20.970
We take really high quality information

228
00:10:20.970 --> 00:10:24.090
from government reports, nonpartisan government reports,

229
00:10:24.090 --> 00:10:26.430
scale it to a ninth grade reading level.

230
00:10:26.430 --> 00:10:28.980
We record it so that if you're blind or illiterate,

231
00:10:28.980 --> 00:10:30.660
you can still participate.

232
00:10:30.660 --> 00:10:32.100
We're working on translating

233
00:10:32.100 --> 00:10:34.290
into the 14 most common languages spoken

234
00:10:34.290 --> 00:10:35.310
in the United States.

235
00:10:35.310 --> 00:10:37.320
So we're really, really focused on inclusion

236
00:10:37.320 --> 00:10:40.080
and bringing all the voices back in.

237
00:10:40.080 --> 00:10:42.510
So that's the citizen side of it.

238
00:10:42.510 --> 00:10:45.480
And then we go to elected officials.

239
00:10:45.480 --> 00:10:49.620
And we say, no, your constituents aren't apathetic,

240
00:10:49.620 --> 00:10:50.550
they're frustrated.

241
00:10:50.550 --> 00:10:52.590
That's why they're not participating.

242
00:10:52.590 --> 00:10:54.810
You think that they're apathetic, that's the story.

243
00:10:54.810 --> 00:10:57.810
They care very much, but they think nobody's listening.

244
00:10:57.810 --> 00:11:00.990
If you go and credibly tell them, no, really, I want to hear

245
00:11:00.990 --> 00:11:04.320
what you have to say, they're gonna show up and tell you.

246
00:11:04.320 --> 00:11:05.430
And it turns out they do.

247
00:11:05.430 --> 00:11:07.980
And so the Institute's primary work,

248
00:11:07.980 --> 00:11:10.500
in a way, is to be matchmakers.

249
00:11:10.500 --> 00:11:14.160
It's to find elected officials who are willing to reengage

250
00:11:14.160 --> 00:11:16.860
and to listen to people beyond the donors

251
00:11:16.860 --> 00:11:18.480
and the party activists,

252
00:11:18.480 --> 00:11:20.610
where everybody already knows where they stand,

253
00:11:20.610 --> 00:11:22.488
why have a deliberation with them?

254
00:11:22.488 --> 00:11:24.090
They tell you with their checkbooks

255
00:11:24.090 --> 00:11:26.340
what they want you to do, right?

256
00:11:26.340 --> 00:11:29.310
Regular citizens oftentimes don't know

257
00:11:29.310 --> 00:11:30.780
ahead of time what they want.

258
00:11:30.780 --> 00:11:33.180
They just wanna figure out the issue by their own lights

259
00:11:33.180 --> 00:11:35.700
and have a chance to talk to somebody in authority

260
00:11:35.700 --> 00:11:37.230
to make those decisions

261
00:11:37.230 --> 00:11:39.210
and convey their views on the matter.

262
00:11:39.210 --> 00:11:41.250
And that's what we do in deliberative town halls.

263
00:11:41.250 --> 00:11:43.380
We take random samples of constituents,

264
00:11:43.380 --> 00:11:45.360
make it easy for them to participate,

265
00:11:45.360 --> 00:11:47.970
subsidize their information searches,

266
00:11:47.970 --> 00:11:50.520
help them find good quality sources,

267
00:11:50.520 --> 00:11:55.260
and then make it very easy to directly convey those views

268
00:11:55.260 --> 00:11:58.200
to their fellow citizens, to engage their fellow citizens,

269
00:11:58.200 --> 00:11:59.880
but then also do that in the presence

270
00:11:59.880 --> 00:12:03.120
and interaction with empowered decision makers.

271
00:12:03.120 --> 00:12:05.250
<v ->Well, Michael, thank you again for sharing your insights</v>

272
00:12:05.250 --> 00:12:07.290
and your expertise and thank you for your work.

273
00:12:07.290 --> 00:12:08.130
<v ->Thank you so much.</v>

274
00:12:08.130 --> 00:12:10.166
I really, really appreciate it.

275
00:12:10.166 --> 00:12:12.749
(upbeat music)

276
00:12:17.490 --> 00:12:19.020
<v ->Gretchen Klingler also believes</v>

277
00:12:19.020 --> 00:12:21.000
we can work past our partisanship.

278
00:12:21.000 --> 00:12:22.140
She has to.

279
00:12:22.140 --> 00:12:24.180
Gretchen spent six years in the Air Force

280
00:12:24.180 --> 00:12:25.110
and eventually became

281
00:12:25.110 --> 00:12:27.600
a Pat Tillman Foundation Military Scholar

282
00:12:27.600 --> 00:12:29.850
who earned degrees in cultural anthropology

283
00:12:29.850 --> 00:12:32.070
and Arabic at Ohio State.

284
00:12:32.070 --> 00:12:34.080
Now she's the senior veterans manager

285
00:12:34.080 --> 00:12:36.480
for the US Global Leadership Coalition,

286
00:12:36.480 --> 00:12:40.650
a bipartisan nonprofit organization based in Washington DC.

287
00:12:40.650 --> 00:12:42.930
She helps veterans share their experiences

288
00:12:42.930 --> 00:12:44.700
to educate Congress and Americans

289
00:12:44.700 --> 00:12:46.890
on the international strategic importance

290
00:12:46.890 --> 00:12:50.820
of combining diplomacy and development with military force.

291
00:12:50.820 --> 00:12:52.500
She sits down with our Ross Bishoff

292
00:12:52.500 --> 00:12:54.510
to discuss her work at the nonprofit,

293
00:12:54.510 --> 00:12:57.540
how her military experience shapes her interactions,

294
00:12:57.540 --> 00:12:59.430
and how we can be just as thoughtful

295
00:12:59.430 --> 00:13:02.010
in our conversations with others.

296
00:13:02.010 --> 00:13:03.900
<v ->Gretchen, thank you so much for doing this today.</v>

297
00:13:03.900 --> 00:13:05.550
<v ->Thank you so much for having me.</v>

298
00:13:05.550 --> 00:13:07.500
I'm really looking forward to the discussion.

299
00:13:07.500 --> 00:13:10.980
<v ->You're a war veteran working to make war rare.</v>

300
00:13:10.980 --> 00:13:14.490
Can you sort of unpack that, explain what your job is?

301
00:13:14.490 --> 00:13:17.910
<v ->My job is that I work for a nonprofit that's based in DC</v>

302
00:13:17.910 --> 00:13:20.370
called the US Global Leadership Coalition.

303
00:13:20.370 --> 00:13:24.540
And the organization itself advocates for

304
00:13:24.540 --> 00:13:26.070
the International Affairs budget.

305
00:13:26.070 --> 00:13:29.400
It's a small 1% of the congressional budget

306
00:13:29.400 --> 00:13:31.740
that funds all of our diplomacy

307
00:13:31.740 --> 00:13:34.920
and development internationally, overseas.

308
00:13:34.920 --> 00:13:38.640
So think funding the State Department, USAID, Peace Corps,

309
00:13:38.640 --> 00:13:42.810
all of these programs that we're using as a nation

310
00:13:42.810 --> 00:13:46.770
to hopefully get out ahead of war and conflict.

311
00:13:46.770 --> 00:13:48.960
It can't always be done, of course.

312
00:13:48.960 --> 00:13:51.750
However, if it's not funded appropriately,

313
00:13:51.750 --> 00:13:54.600
then we certainly can't get out ahead of it.

314
00:13:54.600 --> 00:13:56.610
And so my position

315
00:13:56.610 --> 00:13:59.790
is that I work with veterans across the country,

316
00:13:59.790 --> 00:14:01.710
asking them to come

317
00:14:01.710 --> 00:14:04.950
and be a part of our coalition, come to our events

318
00:14:04.950 --> 00:14:08.640
and learn more about what these programs do for our country,

319
00:14:08.640 --> 00:14:10.770
why they need to continue to be funded,

320
00:14:10.770 --> 00:14:12.630
and then offer them opportunities to reach out

321
00:14:12.630 --> 00:14:14.820
to their representatives and senators

322
00:14:14.820 --> 00:14:18.750
to share why it's important to them as military veterans

323
00:14:18.750 --> 00:14:20.850
that we're supporting soft power

324
00:14:20.850 --> 00:14:22.710
and diplomacy and development.

325
00:14:22.710 --> 00:14:23.970
<v ->What is soft power?</v>

326
00:14:23.970 --> 00:14:28.140
<v ->Soft power, yeah, it's one of those military ish concepts.</v>

327
00:14:28.140 --> 00:14:31.860
But if you think of the military as hard power

328
00:14:31.860 --> 00:14:34.530
and diplomacy, development,

329
00:14:34.530 --> 00:14:37.410
those things that influence other people,

330
00:14:37.410 --> 00:14:39.810
that's more of the soft power piece.

331
00:14:39.810 --> 00:14:41.640
If you combine the two of them together,

332
00:14:41.640 --> 00:14:44.010
it's been termed smart power.

333
00:14:44.010 --> 00:14:47.460
<v ->What is incredible about your story is we live in this</v>

334
00:14:47.460 --> 00:14:52.110
incredibly divisive, echo chambery kinda world

335
00:14:52.110 --> 00:14:55.530
where it's me versus you and all these things.

336
00:14:55.530 --> 00:14:58.410
And yet you are cutting through all of that

337
00:14:58.410 --> 00:15:01.260
to try to get things done.

338
00:15:01.260 --> 00:15:03.675
<v ->Yeah.</v>
<v ->How do you do that?</v>

339
00:15:03.675 --> 00:15:08.675
<v ->(laughing) I listen a lot and I do it very carefully.</v>

340
00:15:08.970 --> 00:15:11.550
When it comes to the programs

341
00:15:11.550 --> 00:15:14.640
that I advocate for professionally,

342
00:15:14.640 --> 00:15:18.000
there are a lot of different ways to yes,

343
00:15:18.000 --> 00:15:19.890
to supporting these programs.

344
00:15:19.890 --> 00:15:23.670
For some people it may be that it's important

345
00:15:23.670 --> 00:15:28.500
for their faith and they believe their humanitarian values

346
00:15:28.500 --> 00:15:31.020
speak to why we as a nation should do this.

347
00:15:31.020 --> 00:15:35.880
For other people, they may believe that the economics

348
00:15:35.880 --> 00:15:39.510
of helping a country overseas build a port

349
00:15:39.510 --> 00:15:42.600
so they can receive American goods and services,

350
00:15:42.600 --> 00:15:45.270
that those economic benefits to our country

351
00:15:45.270 --> 00:15:47.580
are extremely important.

352
00:15:47.580 --> 00:15:52.020
I'm not trying to identify somebody as friend or foe,

353
00:15:52.020 --> 00:15:55.980
or as, you know, whatever political stripes

354
00:15:55.980 --> 00:15:57.900
somebody is choosing to wear.

355
00:15:57.900 --> 00:16:00.870
I want to know what they care about

356
00:16:00.870 --> 00:16:02.940
and what makes them tick and why.

357
00:16:02.940 --> 00:16:06.060
So why does somebody care about the economy?

358
00:16:06.060 --> 00:16:09.210
Why is this something that is so important to them?

359
00:16:09.210 --> 00:16:12.750
Why does somebody care about humanitarian values

360
00:16:12.750 --> 00:16:13.800
or their faith values?

361
00:16:13.800 --> 00:16:15.810
And the more that I get to know that person

362
00:16:15.810 --> 00:16:19.260
as an individual, the more that I'm able to

363
00:16:19.260 --> 00:16:23.550
see the bigger picture of how maybe this person,

364
00:16:23.550 --> 00:16:26.100
if they're interested in supporting the work

365
00:16:26.100 --> 00:16:30.270
that I do professionally, how they may be interested

366
00:16:30.270 --> 00:16:34.740
and fit into the model that we are working with.

367
00:16:34.740 --> 00:16:38.370
And so if we can help advocate for resolutions

368
00:16:38.370 --> 00:16:40.710
before people start shooting at each other,

369
00:16:40.710 --> 00:16:43.770
then that's the goal.

370
00:16:43.770 --> 00:16:47.880
And you don't need to be any particular political stripe

371
00:16:47.880 --> 00:16:49.740
in order to advocate for that.

372
00:16:49.740 --> 00:16:52.950
We're very proud to be a bipartisan coalition

373
00:16:52.950 --> 00:16:55.710
working on both sides and across the aisle.

374
00:16:55.710 --> 00:16:58.560
<v ->What does it take to just cut through all the, I guess,</v>

375
00:16:58.560 --> 00:17:00.746
the rhetoric and the partisanship?

376
00:17:00.746 --> 00:17:04.950
What are maybe just some basic tips you'd give to somebody?

377
00:17:04.950 --> 00:17:08.460
<v ->I would say that everyone that I have talked to</v>

378
00:17:08.460 --> 00:17:12.900
has something that matters to them deeply past politics.

379
00:17:12.900 --> 00:17:17.520
Maybe it's their community or their faith or a hobby,

380
00:17:17.520 --> 00:17:19.890
or an experience that they've had

381
00:17:19.890 --> 00:17:21.840
or a place that they've lived.

382
00:17:21.840 --> 00:17:25.200
And that's the baseline that I start at.

383
00:17:25.200 --> 00:17:28.590
I want to know the person as the person,

384
00:17:28.590 --> 00:17:30.993
and then I build from there.

385
00:17:32.220 --> 00:17:34.800
Most people do know what things

386
00:17:34.800 --> 00:17:38.700
that you can and can't say that might upset somebody

387
00:17:38.700 --> 00:17:43.080
or offend somebody or set somebody off.

388
00:17:43.080 --> 00:17:45.780
And I really just avoid those.

389
00:17:45.780 --> 00:17:49.560
It's because I'm not trying to sit down with somebody

390
00:17:49.560 --> 00:17:51.270
and make somebody mad.

391
00:17:51.270 --> 00:17:52.830
I'm trying to get to know them.

392
00:17:52.830 --> 00:17:55.920
If I throw out degrading commentary about, you know,

393
00:17:55.920 --> 00:17:57.870
one political side or the other,

394
00:17:57.870 --> 00:17:59.880
then I'm already starting to degrade

395
00:17:59.880 --> 00:18:04.880
that relationship before I even set its firm foundation.

396
00:18:05.370 --> 00:18:08.430
So I would say one of the biggest pieces of advice

397
00:18:08.430 --> 00:18:09.690
that I would give is

398
00:18:09.690 --> 00:18:14.010
we know what rhetoric is going to upset people.

399
00:18:14.010 --> 00:18:15.780
Why do we have to use it?

400
00:18:15.780 --> 00:18:19.230
What is the need to use it?

401
00:18:19.230 --> 00:18:22.526
And if you're going into a conversation

402
00:18:22.526 --> 00:18:25.710
to get to know somebody, don't use it.

403
00:18:25.710 --> 00:18:27.810
If you're going into a conversation

404
00:18:27.810 --> 00:18:30.840
because you're trying to argue and prove that you're right,

405
00:18:30.840 --> 00:18:32.790
that's a completely separate discussion.

406
00:18:32.790 --> 00:18:34.140
But that's not the kind of discussion

407
00:18:34.140 --> 00:18:36.150
that I'm trying to have.

408
00:18:36.150 --> 00:18:37.920
Reflecting on my military experience,

409
00:18:37.920 --> 00:18:40.470
there were so many people that I served with,

410
00:18:40.470 --> 00:18:43.470
I have no idea what their politics were or are.

411
00:18:43.470 --> 00:18:44.303
I don't know.

412
00:18:45.150 --> 00:18:48.210
I just knew that we were there in the same room.

413
00:18:48.210 --> 00:18:50.340
I had a respect for them, they had a respect for me,

414
00:18:50.340 --> 00:18:52.008
and we were doing our jobs.

415
00:18:52.008 --> 00:18:53.910
In the end, what you were supposed

416
00:18:53.910 --> 00:18:55.740
to be doing in the military is you were supposed

417
00:18:55.740 --> 00:18:57.210
to have your buddy's back

418
00:18:57.210 --> 00:18:58.560
and your buddy was supposed to have yours,

419
00:18:58.560 --> 00:19:03.560
regardless of what religion, politics, you know, background.

420
00:19:03.810 --> 00:19:05.940
That was supposed to be what it was.

421
00:19:05.940 --> 00:19:08.490
And often that is what it was.

422
00:19:08.490 --> 00:19:09.960
I pull a lot from that,

423
00:19:09.960 --> 00:19:12.930
my time in the military, reflecting on those things.

424
00:19:12.930 --> 00:19:15.990
Because I didn't need to know

425
00:19:15.990 --> 00:19:19.500
what somebody's politics were in order to get the job done.

426
00:19:19.500 --> 00:19:22.181
<v ->Talk about how important it is</v>

427
00:19:22.181 --> 00:19:23.730
when you're dealing with a lot of people

428
00:19:23.730 --> 00:19:26.370
and maybe you're in a room discussing something,

429
00:19:26.370 --> 00:19:30.810
how important is it to just listen, respect people,

430
00:19:30.810 --> 00:19:32.520
allow people to be heard,

431
00:19:32.520 --> 00:19:35.400
like those basic things maybe you learned in kindergarten

432
00:19:35.400 --> 00:19:36.750
that we've gotten away from.

433
00:19:36.750 --> 00:19:40.023
But how important is that and how do you do that?

434
00:19:41.010 --> 00:19:43.770
<v ->So without people feeling like they are heard</v>

435
00:19:43.770 --> 00:19:47.250
and respected, it is impossible to build a community.

436
00:19:47.250 --> 00:19:49.680
Because everybody is in their own corners,

437
00:19:49.680 --> 00:19:51.120
everybody has their shields up,

438
00:19:51.120 --> 00:19:54.420
everybody feels like they have to defend themselves.

439
00:19:54.420 --> 00:19:56.400
But when you open the floor to people

440
00:19:56.400 --> 00:19:59.070
and give them the opportunity to speak,

441
00:19:59.070 --> 00:20:02.730
I mean, that is really the crux of what a democracy is

442
00:20:02.730 --> 00:20:06.150
is the opportunity to speak and be heard.

443
00:20:06.150 --> 00:20:08.910
And if we're not doing that,

444
00:20:08.910 --> 00:20:11.370
then there's no way to bridge those gaps

445
00:20:11.370 --> 00:20:14.340
if all we're doing is picking sides

446
00:20:14.340 --> 00:20:17.370
and you know, throwing spears.

447
00:20:17.370 --> 00:20:22.370
The way that I do that is I do my best to try

448
00:20:23.280 --> 00:20:24.750
to see both sides of the story.

449
00:20:24.750 --> 00:20:27.810
Now granted, I may not agree with it,

450
00:20:27.810 --> 00:20:30.780
but I try to understand it from that person's perspective.

451
00:20:30.780 --> 00:20:34.740
Maybe what their lived experiences are, where they've been,

452
00:20:34.740 --> 00:20:37.980
how they were raised, what era they were raised in.

453
00:20:37.980 --> 00:20:40.470
I mean, there's so many pieces to this puzzle,

454
00:20:40.470 --> 00:20:41.303
and that's one of the things

455
00:20:41.303 --> 00:20:44.430
that I just love about anthropology is there's so many ways

456
00:20:44.430 --> 00:20:47.520
to look at the human experience.

457
00:20:47.520 --> 00:20:50.340
But if I'm taking all of these things into consideration

458
00:20:50.340 --> 00:20:53.190
and do my best to assume

459
00:20:53.190 --> 00:20:55.950
that someone has the best of intentions,

460
00:20:55.950 --> 00:20:58.050
the end result ends up being,

461
00:20:58.050 --> 00:21:00.810
I'm able to have a conversation with somebody

462
00:21:00.810 --> 00:21:04.440
and allow them the opportunity to share

463
00:21:04.440 --> 00:21:07.440
what is on their mind and what's on their heart.

464
00:21:07.440 --> 00:21:08.880
And really just try

465
00:21:08.880 --> 00:21:12.180
to see it from their perspective without me trying to put

466
00:21:12.180 --> 00:21:15.120
my own judgment on it.

467
00:21:15.120 --> 00:21:17.970
If I'm trying to get to know somebody,

468
00:21:17.970 --> 00:21:22.680
placing blame and judgment on decisions

469
00:21:22.680 --> 00:21:24.660
that they've made in their life

470
00:21:24.660 --> 00:21:27.090
makes it that much harder to build rapport

471
00:21:27.090 --> 00:21:31.140
and to create that foundational level of respect.

472
00:21:31.140 --> 00:21:34.230
<v ->What is it like to sit down with people,</v>

473
00:21:34.230 --> 00:21:36.690
have this kind of a civil discourse

474
00:21:36.690 --> 00:21:40.560
or a really just a positive conversation about this

475
00:21:40.560 --> 00:21:44.850
and just see what happens or feel the energy in the room?

476
00:21:44.850 --> 00:21:46.920
What's that like for you?

477
00:21:46.920 --> 00:21:50.760
<v ->It is like feeling a weight lifted off my shoulders</v>

478
00:21:50.760 --> 00:21:53.700
where I know that the person

479
00:21:53.700 --> 00:21:57.840
that is sitting next to me respects me and I respect them

480
00:21:57.840 --> 00:21:59.550
even if we disagree.

481
00:21:59.550 --> 00:22:02.730
And so there isn't that burden of

482
00:22:02.730 --> 00:22:05.070
I had to say the right thing, I have to do the right thing,

483
00:22:05.070 --> 00:22:08.280
I have to watch what I say about this and that.

484
00:22:08.280 --> 00:22:10.800
I mean, in practice I've gotten used to that

485
00:22:10.800 --> 00:22:13.710
because of course I have my own politics and so do they.

486
00:22:13.710 --> 00:22:16.950
But if I'm having a conversation that is supposed

487
00:22:16.950 --> 00:22:20.160
to be built around mutual respect and trust

488
00:22:20.160 --> 00:22:24.300
and building understanding of each other's experiences,

489
00:22:24.300 --> 00:22:27.900
if that person is meeting me where I am

490
00:22:27.900 --> 00:22:30.570
and I'm meeting me where they are, we're able

491
00:22:30.570 --> 00:22:34.290
to build a foundation of friendship and trust

492
00:22:34.290 --> 00:22:39.090
and understanding that goes past politics

493
00:22:39.090 --> 00:22:41.524
and some of the pettiness

494
00:22:41.524 --> 00:22:45.690
that we see right now across social media

495
00:22:45.690 --> 00:22:48.120
or media in general.

496
00:22:48.120 --> 00:22:51.810
I think there's so much focus right now

497
00:22:51.810 --> 00:22:56.220
on yelling at somebody until they are willing to back down,

498
00:22:56.220 --> 00:23:00.660
not agree with you, but just back down and be quiet.

499
00:23:00.660 --> 00:23:03.540
So that say it were me, that like,

500
00:23:03.540 --> 00:23:06.240
I'm gonna yell at you and demean you

501
00:23:06.240 --> 00:23:10.590
and make you look bad until you just sit down and be quiet.

502
00:23:10.590 --> 00:23:12.600
And then I can have the platform.

503
00:23:12.600 --> 00:23:14.700
That's not what it's supposed to be.

504
00:23:14.700 --> 00:23:16.770
It's supposed to be that we're sitting down

505
00:23:16.770 --> 00:23:18.690
and helping each other understand.

506
00:23:18.690 --> 00:23:20.190
And that's hard work.

507
00:23:20.190 --> 00:23:24.330
It is hard work, and it is exhausting at times

508
00:23:24.330 --> 00:23:26.190
because you really have to sit down

509
00:23:26.190 --> 00:23:28.740
and put yourself in somebody else's shoes

510
00:23:28.740 --> 00:23:33.210
and try to understand life through their eyes,

511
00:23:33.210 --> 00:23:36.630
not as you see them, but as they see themselves.

512
00:23:36.630 --> 00:23:38.310
Sometimes that changes minds.

513
00:23:38.310 --> 00:23:42.630
Sometimes sharing my experience with somebody goes, oh gosh,

514
00:23:42.630 --> 00:23:44.970
I didn't realize that somebody had that experience before.

515
00:23:44.970 --> 00:23:47.100
Man, I really need to think about

516
00:23:47.100 --> 00:23:48.840
where I'm coming from in this.

517
00:23:48.840 --> 00:23:52.200
And sometimes their experience has solidified them

518
00:23:52.200 --> 00:23:54.870
and is so resolute that they hear you,

519
00:23:54.870 --> 00:23:56.910
but it's not changing their mind.

520
00:23:56.910 --> 00:24:00.240
And I don't go into conversations to change people's minds.

521
00:24:00.240 --> 00:24:03.210
I just want them to understand where I'm coming from.

522
00:24:03.210 --> 00:24:04.830
<v ->Gretchen, this has been amazing.</v>

523
00:24:04.830 --> 00:24:06.780
Thank you so much for talking with us today.

524
00:24:06.780 --> 00:24:08.080
<v ->Thank you for having me.</v>

525
00:24:09.661 --> 00:24:12.244
(upbeat music)

526
00:24:15.090 --> 00:24:16.710
<v ->We all have our own politics.</v>

527
00:24:16.710 --> 00:24:18.540
That's not going to change.

528
00:24:18.540 --> 00:24:20.370
We all have our own unique histories,

529
00:24:20.370 --> 00:24:23.430
our individual experiences, and life lessons.

530
00:24:23.430 --> 00:24:26.700
That being said, we also all have a responsibility

531
00:24:26.700 --> 00:24:30.330
to recognize that in each other, to listen to one another,

532
00:24:30.330 --> 00:24:34.200
and accept others' realities even if we might not agree.

533
00:24:34.200 --> 00:24:37.290
And until we do that, the echo chambers will keep echoing,

534
00:24:37.290 --> 00:24:38.924
the rhetoric will keep flying,

535
00:24:38.924 --> 00:24:41.070
and the Thanksgiving dinner conversations

536
00:24:41.070 --> 00:24:42.750
will keep getting more tense

537
00:24:42.750 --> 00:24:45.540
as the mashed potatoes slowly grow cold.

538
00:24:45.540 --> 00:24:48.480
A world of civil discourse is possible.

539
00:24:48.480 --> 00:24:51.300
All we have to do is listen, understand,

540
00:24:51.300 --> 00:24:53.070
and remember the lesson we all learned

541
00:24:53.070 --> 00:24:54.810
when we were just young children,

542
00:24:54.810 --> 00:24:57.303
treat others the way you want to be treated.

543
00:24:59.779 --> 00:25:02.362
(upbeat music)

544
00:25:05.812 --> 00:25:08.395
(upbeat music)

545
00:25:14.167 --> 00:25:15.210
"Now at Ohio State"

546
00:25:15.210 --> 00:25:17.670
is produced by The Ohio State University's Office

547
00:25:17.670 --> 00:25:19.560
of Marketing and Communications.

548
00:25:19.560 --> 00:25:24.560
For more information, visit us at go.osu.edu/now.

549
00:25:25.320 --> 00:25:27.270
I'm your host, Jacob Carozza.

550
00:25:27.270 --> 00:25:28.320
Thanks for listening.

